May have been a bug in the old version I was somehow running with this morning. I'll assume that unless I can reproduce it and submit a proper bug report.
-- /_ Joe Kesselman (he/him/his) -/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans: / https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/ () I still don't think HTML mail is a good idea /\ but Outlook/Android is insisting. Need to change mail client. ________________________________ From: kriegaex (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2023 11:26:01 PM To: dev@xalan.apache.org <dev@xalan.apache.org> Subject: Re: [PR] Maven build improvements [xalan-java] kriegaex commented on PR #119: URL: https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/pull/119#issuecomment-1809530572 > When the binary-assembly module was set to run as type pom. It seemed to be overwriting its own pom.xml with one of the archive files. For now I've worked around that by setting the output type to jar even though it shouldn't be producing a jarfile we need, but at some point I will have to understand why that was happening. No, it does not overwrite the POM. I tried with your latest commit. Maybe in a previous version, you experimented with output directories or with special path and name for the dependency-reduced POM and accidentally ended up putting it into the base instead of the build directory. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org
