kriegaex opened a new pull request, #135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/pull/135

   Follow-up to #134, because that one was merged without this commit:
   
   Running javadoc generation with or without it on the stylebook classpath had 
absolutely no effect. Comparing javadocs with and without it revealed that both 
directory trees were binary identical.
   
   Actually, on JDK 8 the JAR cannot have been working correctly anyway, 
because the JAR file contained Java 1.1 class files (major 45), which is OK. 
But it also uses several classes which are no longer available in JDK 8, i.e. 
the code cannot have been working there. For example, one class imported was
     * `com.sun.tools.doclets.IndexBuilder`,
   
   which a web search found in JDKs 1.2 and 1.3. In 1.8, there is
     * `com.sun.tools.doclets.internal.toolkit.util.IndexBuilder`,
   
   which might serve a similar purpose, but neither is public API nor the class 
referenced by the doclet code. I really think, this is just cruft that can go 
away.
   
   @jkesselm 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@xalan.apache.org

Reply via email to