I should note too that the proposal says nothing (directly) about adding more 
binaries to the mix, just shipping the test source with the Xalan source. The 
test suite may have binary blobs, but if so we were already shipping them with 
the Xalan source; nothing "new" involved. Yes, a possible point of cleanup but 
that's a separate issue, and should be a separate task.

Again: It doesn't all have to be done immediately/simultaneously. In practical 
terms it can't be. Incremental improvement.

Perfectionism leads to paralysis. Embrace the "good enough for now" and more 
real work gets done.


--
   /_  Joe Kesselman (he/him/his)
-/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans:
   /   https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/

Caveat: Opinionated old geezer with overcompensated writer's block. May be 
redundant, verbose, prolix, sesquipedalian, didactic, officious, or redundant.
________________________________
From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2023 9:03:57 AM
To: dev@xalan.apache.org <dev@xalan.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Policy question re src distribution

>First, remember that SHOULD is not MUST, and that one of the distro files 
>(bin) is already fully compiled code and carries the binary dependencies to 
>run it, by design and decades-long history

Thank you for the reminder that PMC is free to ignore the rules as they see fit.
A decade-long bad practice is not the best excuse for adding more binaries to 
the mix.
A year ago Gary said "migration to Maven would alleviate the 
binaries-in-source-packages issues",
and the suggestion of adding more jars to the source release goes against the 
rules: https://lists.apache.org/thread/v6sxd9kb3r1m5qq0vv0t6gwg5wg99y9r

Since the build system is going to switch anyway, the ones who build xalan-java 
from the source would have to adapt anyway.
There's no point in reproducing decare-old source release packages 
byte-to-byte. Go ahead and remove the unnecessary stuff.

>it wouldn't be impossible, just ugly.

I do not see reasons to go for ugly solutions that deviate from the ASF policy.
How about just skipping the ugly work and avoiding xalan-test in the xalan 
source package?
The less you have to do the faster you can deliver the first iteration.
If somebody wants to execute tests, they can download xalan-test and be done 
with it.

Vladimir

Reply via email to