I really do need to make time to take a deep look at what you have done with 
the xslt3-subset implementation. You have gotten farther with it that I would 
have expected without deeper redesign of the system.

--
   /_  Joe Kesselman (he/him/his)
-/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans:
   /   https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/

Caveat: Opinionated old geezer with overcompensated writer's block. May be 
redundant, verbose, prolix, sesquipedalian, didactic, officious, or redundant.
________________________________
From: Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 8:47:15 AM
To: dev@xalan.apache.org <dev@xalan.apache.org>
Subject: Re: xalan-j's xslt 3.0 implementation status

I don't have an opinion on these APIs.

I would like to get a new 2.x release out to make sure we push out any bugs 
fixes. Getting a beta out for the new XSLT 3 code would be nice as well.

Gary

On Mon, Mar 3, 2025, 05:43 Mukul Gandhi 
<gandhi.mu...@gmail.com<mailto:gandhi.mu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
    As per my knowledge, the following XSLT 3.0's significant features
are yet to be implemented within Xalan-J's XSL 3 dev repos branch.

xsl:merge
xsl:fork
xsl:mode
Streaming (XSLT 3.0 spec's section 18)

I'm curious whether anyone is interested to have these XSL 3 features
implemented within Xalan-J?

Any thoughts from Gary & Joseph shall be great to know.

Many thanks.

--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

(alt email : muk...@apache.org<mailto:muk...@apache.org>)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org<mailto:dev-unsubscr...@xalan.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: 
dev-h...@xalan.apache.org<mailto:dev-h...@xalan.apache.org>

Reply via email to