Thanks, found and fixed the problem (in JIRA now as XDP-139).
Actually, Greg Kerdemelidis had already pointed out to me that the
namespace of the generated tag impls was wrong, but I didn't realize
that QTags determines this solely from the tag class name -- I thought
that the namespace definition in the ${xdoclet.qtags.namespace} took
care of it. So, Greg, you did not have some kind of build problem as I
had suggested.
And I totally missed the "@throw" typo. Thanks Konstantin!
... . . . . j
Joe Berkovitz wrote:
When invoking my recently contributed actionscript plugin from Ant, it
generates a ton of "unknown tag warnings" (in spite of working correctly):
[xdoclet] Running org.xdoclet.plugin.actionscript.ActionScriptPlugin
[xdoclet] Unknown tag: @throw in
file:/C:/work/projects/dev/cart/core/java/com/allurent/arc/message/ArcMessageServer.java
(line 93)
[xdoclet] Unknown tag: @throw in
file:/C:/work/projects/dev/cart/core/java/com/allurent/arc/message/ArcMessageServer.java
(line 148)
[xdoclet] Unknown tag: @actionscript.class in
file:/C:/work/projects/dev/cart/core/java/com/allurent/arc/order/CreditCardPaymentInfo.java
(line 35)
[xdoclet] Unknown tag: @actionscript.class in
file:/C:/work/projects/dev/cart/core/java/com/allurent/arc/order/Order.java
(line 37)
As you can see, xdoclet is complaining about regular javadoc tags, which
is annoying.
But what is particularly odd is that it is complaining about the very
tags that it is processing correctly, such as @actionscript.class.
Does anyone have any suggestions on what the problem might be?
Thanks much for any help...
... . . . . j
.
