Martin Aliger wrote: > Ok. Shoudn't it read the "real" styles as well? The specifiaction does > not say (I believe) that it has to be saved again as common style so > OOo could simply convert it to autostyles (or single attributes).
That would be a way to solve it, but having real table styles is quite tempting. > I know this is not top priority, but it would be nice when OOo have > full OpenDocument conformace. After all, it is it's native format! Not > being fully conformat means, you potentionally will not import ODF > saved in other products, which will degrade ODF as whole. Not a nice > view. The first priority wrt. ODF is not to create anything that violates the specification. Second to nth priority is to support everything written down in the spec. You should see that ODF is *not* the OOo file format with another name (though a particular competitor likes to allege that), it's a standard created from a larger group where OOo was only a part of so it's not surprising that there are things in the spec that currently are not supported by OOo. For the reasons you mentioned this is subject to change, but the speed of these changes may vary. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
