On 18/10/2007, Svante Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The reason why the XSLT processor requires office:document and not > office:document-content is that it expects to receive one single > unzipped XML stream/file, where at least content.xml, meta.xml and > styles.xml are being merged to one, often called the "flat XML file". > Even embedded pictures of the ODF document are being merged into this > XML file Base64 encoded.
Which does sound very wasteful. Especially for large documents with many images? > > > Is this the best way to do it? Best for what :-) > Finally if an XSL transformation is based not on a flat xml format, but > on the package format, the similar transformation can be easily be used > outside of the office, for instance as part of a browser extension. > > Anyone here who would be able and interested to make such an improvement > come alive? Not without some agreement that this approach is supported by ODF. It's hardly a lot of work though? I have code that deals with an unzipped ODF document, which I guess is just the sort of thing that you're referring to? Where is the manifest defined please? I'm assuming it's an XML format. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
