by the way - i can help with migration xslt-based filters to XSLT 2.0 with almost ten years of xslt experience
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Svante Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ian Shields wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 17:06 +0800, ChengLin wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is it possible to use XSLTC [1] in XML Filter to speed up the >>> transformations? > > It is a matter of XSLTC reliabilty, if the result has a similar quality as > with the Xalan processor (from the same xalan.jar). I had once problem with > the XHTML export perhaps it has changed, havn't checked for while and I must > admit forgot about my bug-id. > > But instead of switching to XSLTC, I would personally rather switch to > Saxon-B 9.0 [2] providing XSLT 2.0, XPath 2.0 and XQuery 1.0. > >>> [1] http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/xsltc_usage.html >>> >> >> I have a large and somewhat complex filter and it runs much faster the >> second time I use it after starting OOo than the first. I imagine OOo is >> either caching something or compiling it. >> > > Yes, there is a caching. The stylesheets are being parsed only once and than > cached after first usage. > > But even Java start up might have its part. > Not sure if OpenJDK 6.0 build b10 [3] has the same performance improvements > as the Java SE 6 update 10 [4], but it will improve a lot in the future. > > Cheers, > Svante > > [2] http://saxon.sourceforge.net#F9.0B > [3] http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/ > [4] > http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/javase/java6u10/index.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
