On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 04:06:11PM +0100, Dave Pawson wrote: > 2008/7/25 Ian Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Frankly, I like having the Java XSLT processors. I haven't looked > > closely at adding extensions to libxslt, other than a quick scan over > > http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/extensions.html. > > Daniel isn't up for moving to XSLT 2.0 :-)
right, lack of resources, really. Can't do everything, sorry :-) > > > Secondly, I've used libxslt, both as part of XML Copy Editor and > > stand-alone to transform XML using the IBM developerWorks XML Author > > package (see http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/i-dwauthors/) and > > it is way slower than Xalan (or MSXML). I haven't researched whether > > this is some peculiarity of the dW stylesheet, but we're talking many > > minutes vs a few seconds here. > > That flies in the face of most timing comparisons I've seen for 1.0 > > Have you tried libxslt from the command line for your timings? One of the sorry thing is that we require libxslt (at least here) wei:~ -> rpm -q --requires openoffice.org-core | grep xslt libxslt.so.1()(64bit) wei:~ -> and well the footprint of the application is still a concern for some people. Not everybody can buy more RAM every now and then ... But it's your code, your decision, so I have little to say here, just watching ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
