+1

--k

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:29:59PM -0600, David Waite wrote:
> +1
> 
> On May 31, 2005, at 11:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >+1
> >
> >--                                                             --
> >Ken Kress
> >Information Technology
> >Lockwood?
> >10 Valley Stream Parkway
> >Malvern, PA 19355
> >Phone: (484) 605-4834
> >Fax: (484) 605-4903
> >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >05/31/2005 01:16 PM
> >Please respond to dev
> >
> >
> >        To:     dev@xmlbeans.apache.org
> >        cc:
> >        Subject:        [VOTE] xmlbeanscxx subproject
> >
> >
> >I think we've now had plenty of time for discussion.  Please vote on
> >the following:
> >
> >Should the XMLBeans project sponsor the proposed xmlbeanscxx project,
> >as described in Heidi's proposal (see below)?
> >
> >As usual, all members of the xmlbeans community are welcome to vote,
> >but only XMLBeans PMC members have binding votes.  This vote will
> >close at midnight, 4 June UTC (Friday at 5 PM PDT):
> >http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html? 
> >year=2005&month=6&day=4&hour=00&min=00&sec=00
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Cliff
> >
> >On 5/19/05, Heidi Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Since writing the XmlBeans C++ proposal a few weeks ago, we have done
> >>
> >more
> >
> >>analysis of our planned approach, and we have come to the conclusion
> >>
> >that
> >
> >>there are significant and important differences between the XmlBeans
> >>architecture and that of our existing product that we referenced  
> >>in the
> >>proposal as a starting point for the Apache project. In addition, we
> >>
> >have
> >
> >>since made progress on the XmlBeans C++ implementation with  
> >>developers
> >>actively working on the project internally.
> >>
> >>Our goal is clear, in that we plan to develop XmlBeans C++ to be
> >>
> >compatible
> >
> >>with the Java version, both architecturally and keeping to the API as
> >>closely as possible. There are many components in our existing LEIF
> >>
> >product
> >
> >>that will provide a starting point for XmlBeans C++ to jump-start the
> >>project. However, given the differences, we now plan to have our
> >>
> >developers
> >
> >>borrow/modify from this applicable code and then submit it to the  
> >>Apache
> >>project during implementation.
> >>
> >>This approach will be a lot less confusing to the community,  
> >>giving our
> >>developers the responsibility of incorporating any of our existing
> >>
> >product
> >
> >>code into the Apache project, avoiding that burden for other
> >>
> >contributors.
> >
> >>We can transfer our work under the auspices of Apache as soon as the
> >>
> >project
> >
> >>is approved and the environment is set up.
> >>
> >>
> >>Heidi.
> >>--------------------
> >>Heidi Buelow
> >>Rogue Wave, a division of Quovadx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: Heidi Buelow
> >>>Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 11:12 AM
> >>>To: 'dev@xmlbeans.apache.org'
> >>>Subject: Proposal for xmlbeanscxx
> >>>
> >>>This is a proposal for an xmlbeans subproject which should be
> >>>
> >discussed
> >
> >>>here
> >>>and voted on at the xmlbeans PMC before going to the incubator for a
> >>>
> >vote.
> >
> >>>
> >>>Proposal to create a C++ version of the Apache XMLBeans project
> >>>
> >>>Submission date: 15 May 2005, Tim Triemstra, Heidi Buelow (TimT @
> >>>RogueWave
> >>>dot-com, Buelow @ RogueWave dot-com)
> >>>
> >>>(0) rationale
> >>>
> >>>Apache currently maintains the XMLBeans/Java project, a tool that  
> >>>uses
> >>>
> >XML
> >
> >>>Schema as a basis for generating Java classes used to easily access
> >>>
> >XML
> >
> >>>instance data. The goal of the XMLBeans/C++ project is to provide a
> >>>
> >very
> >
> >>>similar user experience for C++ developers as that provided by the
> >>>XMLBeans/Java version. This includes generating strongly-typed C++
> >>>
> >classes
> >
> >>>for the XML binding as well as providing low-level C++ APIs enabling
> >>>access
> >>>to the raw, underlying XML content. Where possible, the XMLBeans/C++
> >>>project
> >>>will provide a nearly identical API and parallel architecture to  
> >>>that
> >>>provided by the Java counterpart, and will closely mimic both  
> >>>features
> >>>
> >and
> >
> >>>schedule.
> >>>
> >>>Rogue Wave Software will help jump start this project by  
> >>>contributing
> >>>
> >the
> >
> >>>existing XML to C++ binding code distributed as part of the LEIF
> >>>
> >product
> >
> >>>to
> >>>the Apache community. This product has been in production for  
> >>>over two
> >>>years, and will provide a solid foundation for a C++ version of
> >>>
> >XMLBeans.
> >
> >>>
> >>>(0.1) criteria
> >>>
> >>>Meritocracy: The C++ version of the project should adhere to the  
> >>>same
> >>>open,
> >>>merit-based community standards as other Apache projects.
> >>>
> >>>Contributions and Core Developers: Code being contributed is  
> >>>actually
> >>>
> >a
> >
> >>>subset of the LEIF product. Currently, work is underway to remove  
> >>>any
> >>>proprietary dependencies from within the code. A "cleaned" version
> >>>
> >that is
> >
> >>>ready for contribution will be made available to the community  
> >>>around
> >>>
> >the
> >
> >>>middle of May 2005. This initial contribution will be fully
> >>>
> >functioning,
> >
> >>>but
> >>>missing a few key features of the Java version of XMLBeans.
> >>>
> >>>The community should be able to immediately jump in and begin work,
> >>>
> >along
> >
> >>>side dedicated Rogue Wave personnel, to turn the initial  
> >>>contribution
> >>>
> >into
> >
> >>>a
> >>>feature-compatible version of XMLBeans for C++.
> >>>
> >>>Community: The community around the Java version of XMLBeans is
> >>>
> >already
> >
> >>>vibrant and growing. There is every reason to believe many of those
> >>>
> >within
> >
> >>>the existing community have experience and/or general interest in a
> >>>successful, compatible C++ implementation of the toolset. This  
> >>>should
> >>>ensure
> >>>an immediately active and vocal community, even if the primary
> >>>
> >interest is
> >
> >>>in ensuring a similar experience between versions. There is  
> >>>already a
> >>>large
> >>>group of developers "in the wild" using the original XML to C++
> >>>
> >binding
> >
> >>>tool
> >>>that is serving as the original contribution for this project. These
> >>>
> >users
> >
> >>>will be migrating to the XMLBeans/C++ code over time and have  
> >>>already
> >>>indicated a keen interest in tracking, and even participating in the
> >>>Apache-led project.
> >>>
> >>>Apache Alignment: The XML binding tool from which the XMLBeans/C++
> >>>
> >port
> >
> >>>will
> >>>morph does not include a full XML parser, but instead uses a small,
> >>>focused
> >>>parser designed expressly for tight C++ to XML binding support. The
> >>>general
> >>>purpose XML instance data APIs within XMLBeans will require  
> >>>additional
> >>>code
> >>>and may be a good fit for the Xerces parser to enable some required
> >>>features.
> >>>
> >>>Additionally, at least one member of an existing Apache project has
> >>>expressed interest in a project like XMLBeans/C++ to aid in his
> >>>
> >current
> >
> >>>work. Higher-level projects such as Axis for C++ seem to be natural
> >>>beneficiaries of this work.
> >>>
> >>>(0.2) known risks
> >>>
> >>>Orphaned Products: One of the first questions when a commercial  
> >>>entity
> >>>offers code to the public is "will this code be abandoned?" To be
> >>>
> >clear,
> >
> >>>Rogue Wave decided to initiate this process due to its own  
> >>>significant
> >>>interest in the XMLBeans feature set already present in Java, and  
> >>>its
> >>>
> >need
> >
> >>>for similar features in C++. We have significant product goals  
> >>>moving
> >>>forward around XML for which the XMLBeans model fits perfectly.  
> >>>Rather
> >>>than
> >>>simply copy the design and keep the project closed, we felt that the
> >>>downstream products would reap significant benefits from opening the
> >>>
> >XML
> >
> >>>layer to the community. Keeping the C++ version in sync with the  
> >>>Java
> >>>version, even if it were to not be accepted as an Apache project,  
> >>>can
> >>>
> >only
> >
> >>>help its overall adoption.
> >>>
> >>>Additionally, a diverse committer base is a strong goal for this
> >>>
> >project.
> >
> >>>Numerous users of the contributed XML to C++ binding tool have
> >>>
> >indicated
> >
> >>>interest in participating, many of whom have critical projects
> >>>
> >dependant
> >
> >>>on
> >>>this work and resources available to continue to ensure the  
> >>>viability
> >>>
> >of
> >
> >>>the
> >>>project well into the future.
> >>>
> >>>Inexperience with Open Source: Like many companies entering this
> >>>
> >arena, we
> >
> >>>have limited experience working on open source projects. Our primary
> >>>
> >goal
> >
> >>>is
> >>>to foster an active community around XMLBeans/C++ so advice will be
> >>>
> >taken
> >
> >>>to
> >>>heart, and significant resources will be dedicated to the project to
> >>>
> >get
> >
> >>>it
> >>>off the ground. However, we hope that our experience working in open
> >>>standards groups will aid in the transition to the open source
> >>>
> >community.
> >
> >>>
> >>>Initial Reliance on Salaried Workers: Due to the rapid process of
> >>>transitioning to work on the open source XMLBeans/C++ project,  
> >>>only a
> >>>
> >few
> >
> >>>of
> >>>the listed contributors will be outside the commercial realm. We
> >>>
> >expect
> >
> >>>this
> >>>list of external volunteers to grow significantly after the initial
> >>>
> >public
> >
> >>>code drop.
> >>>
> >>>Licensing, Patents, Miscellaneous Legal: We are conducting a legal
> >>>
> >review
> >
> >>>of
> >>>the code and existing contracts. This review should be done shortly
> >>>
> >and
> >
> >>>any
> >>>code contributed will be licensed under the latest ASF terms.
> >>>
> >>>Commercial Interest: XMLBeans/C++ will be maintained as an open  
> >>>source
> >>>Apache project, with all relevant enhancements contributed to the
> >>>community.
> >>>Additionally, there is every intention to use XMLBeans/C++ within
> >>>
> >future
> >
> >>>commercial products, thereby resulting in even greater testing and
> >>>
> >user
> >
> >>>exposure. It is expected that other companies may well wish to  
> >>>use the
> >>>project's code within their own commercial endeavors, which of  
> >>>course
> >>>would
> >>>be fine.
> >>>
> >>>(1) scope of the subproject
> >>>
> >>>The XMLBeans/C++ subproject will conform to the identical scope as
> >>>
> >that
> >
> >>>laid
> >>>out for the partner Java project. Special care will be taken to
> >>>
> >implement
> >
> >>>features and add conveniences that would be expected by a C++
> >>>
> >developer.
> >
> >>>
> >>>For clarity, the goals of the XMLBeans/C++ project are:
> >>>
> >>>Generation of plain C++ classes to model XML Schema Validation of  
> >>>C++
> >>>objects against the source XML Schema Access to partial document
> >>>
> >instance
> >
> >>>data (fragments) Efficient "parse as necessary" access that forgives
> >>>
> >extra
> >
> >>>data Access to the full XML infoset
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>(2) identify the initial source for subproject code
> >>>
> >>>Some background information may be found on the LEIF product and the
> >>>associated Data Tier.
> >>>
> >>>LEIF product page (http://www.roguewave.com/products/leif)
> >>>
> >>>The C++/XML binding contribution code can be found at the following
> >>>
> >link:
> >
> >>>
> >>>xmlBeans open source information
> >>>(http://www.roguewave.com/opensource/XMLbeans.cfm)
> >>>
> >>>(3) identify the ASF resources to be created
> >>>
> >>>(3.1) mailing list(s)
> >>>
> >>>xmlbeanscxx-dev
> >>>xmlbeanscxx-user
> >>>xmlbeanscxx-commits
> >>>
> >>>(3.2) SVN repositories
> >>>
> >>>xml-xmlbeanscxx
> >>>
> >>>(3.3) Bugzilla
> >>>
> >>>xml xmlbeanscxx
> >>>
> >>>(4.0) identify the initial set of committers
> >>>
> >>>This is a preliminary list that will be updated with volunteer
> >>>
> >members.
> >
> >>>
> >>>Tim Triemstra (TimT @ RogueWave dot-com)
> >>>John Hinke (Hinke @ RogueWave dot-com)
> >>>Heidi Buelow (Buelow @ RogueWave dot-com)
> >>>Allen Brookes (ABrookes @ RogueWave dot-com)
> >>>David Haney (David.Haney @ RogueWave dot-com)
> >>>Michael Yoder (Michael.Yoder @ RogueWave dot-com)
> >>>
> >>>(5) identify apache sponsoring individual
> >>>
> >>>Cliff Schmidt, of the XMLBeans/Java project, has volunteered to
> >>>
> >sponsor
> >
> >>>this
> >>>project.
> >>>
> >>>Cliff Schmidt (CliffS @ Apache dot-org)
> >>>
> >>>(6) open issues for discussion
> >>>
> >>>The original code contribution has a lot of proven code for  
> >>>creating a
> >>>binding between XML Schema and C++ classes. However, the  
> >>>contribution
> >>>
> >will
> >
> >>>require a significant overhaul, and even complete re-writes in some
> >>>
> >areas,
> >
> >>>in order to reach compatibility with the XMLBeans/Java version.
> >>>
> >Detailed
> >
> >>>differences will be discussed openly within the community so that an
> >>>appropriate plan for each area can be reached. This proposal is not
> >>>
> >the
> >
> >>>best
> >>>place to lay out all the technical details, however you will find
> >>>
> >below a
> >
> >>>preliminary list of issues, priorities, and estimated timelines.
> >>>
> >>>API discrepencies between contributed code and XMLBeans 2.0 The
> >>>contributed
> >>>code includes a very similar type-binding API in C++ to that  
> >>>provided
> >>>
> >in
> >
> >>>XMLBeans for Java. However, the XMLBeans cursor access to the
> >>>
> >underlying
> >
> >>>infoset has no equivilant in the contributed code and will require
> >>>extensive
> >>>work to the underlying object model to support.
> >>>
> >>>Addressing this deficiency is considered the highest priority task
> >>>
> >facing
> >
> >>>the C++ project.
> >>>
> >>>Several options are available including porting the XMLBeans object
> >>>
> >model
> >
> >>>completely over to C++ or looking for ways to augment the  
> >>>contributed
> >>>code.
> >>>Most likely a near-complete rewrite of this section will be the best
> >>>approach.
> >>>
> >>>Rough estimates for a working implementation of the cursor  
> >>>feature are
> >>>between three and five months Code generator
> >>>
> >>>The contributed C++ code is based on a proprietary code generator,
> >>>although
> >>>it too is written in Java (not C++). The long-term plan is to
> >>>
> >consolidate
> >
> >>>both C++ and Java projects under the same code generator, most  
> >>>likely
> >>>
> >the
> >
> >>>one already included in the Java version of the XMLBeans.
> >>>
> >>>This is not considered a priority-1 task at this point, more of a  
> >>>long
> >>>term
> >>>goal and convenience. If it saves time in other priority tasks it  
> >>>will
> >>>
> >be
> >
> >>>looked at closely, however.
> >>>
> >>>Timeline for this transition is 5-7 months, but may be very much
> >>>
> >sooner
> >
> >>>depending on available resources.
> >>>
> >>>Platform support
> >>>Unlike Java, the C++ port will have significant issues around  
> >>>platform
> >>>
> >and
> >
> >>>compiler support. In order to help with this the project will be  
> >>>using
> >>>
> >the
> >
> >>>C++ standard library, and may in fact benefit greatly from the
> >>>
> >proposed
> >
> >>>Apache C++ StdLib (STDCXX). Initially the native StdLib will be  
> >>>used.
> >>>
> >>>Good platform support will be very important so even the early  
> >>>builds
> >>>should
> >>>be done on Windows and Linux, and preferably at least one Unix
> >>>
> >variety.
> >
> >>>Long
> >>>term the matrix should be very large.
> >>>
> >>>The initial contribution is working on Linux but it is really just a
> >>>preview
> >>>look at code, not a true product build. Windows and Linux support
> >>>
> >should
> >
> >>>accompany the initial beta release, with Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, and
> >>>
> >other
> >
> >>>Linux distros following within three months.
> >>>
> >>>Estimated timeline (very rough)
> >>>Initial submission of proposal and example code: 12 May 2005 Apache
> >>>structure in place and code building: 1 July 2005 Re-write of  
> >>>internal
> >>>object model building: 1 September 2005 XMLBeans/Java 2.0 feature
> >>>equivilant
> >>>beta: 1 December 2005
> >>>
> >>>This timeline is based on a very preliminary discovery of issues and
> >>>
> >is
> >
> >>>based on limited resource information. There is little chance for  
> >>>this
> >>>schedule to be elongated by very much time as there are already a  
> >>>few
> >>>dedicated resources assigned to the project, but there is also  
> >>>little
> >>>known
> >>>about how much a concerted community effort could speed things  
> >>>up. In
> >>>general the feeling is that a greater community involvement will
> >>>
> >greatly
> >
> >>>improve the test suite, identified bugs, and platform support - not
> >>>necessarily the initial speed of feature development.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--------------------
> >>>Heidi Buelow
> >>>Rogue Wave, a division of Quovadx
> >>>
> >>>-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> >>>-
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >______________________________________________________________________ 
> >__
> >The information in this e-mail, and any attachment therein, is  
> >confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the  
> >intended recipient, please return the e-mail to the sender and  
> >delete it from your computer. Although The Bank of New York  
> >attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not  
> >guarantee that either are virus-free and accepts no liability for  
> >any damage sustained as a result of viruses.
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> David Waite
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to