[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-220?page=comments#action_12431639 
] 
            
Adam Lewandowski commented on XMLBEANS-220:
-------------------------------------------

Is anyone else experiencing this? It causes the generated XML to fail 
validation which seems like a serious issue.


> XmlObject.xmlText(XmlOptions) outputs xsi:nil="true" where schema definition 
> is minOccurs="0" and default value for nillable="false"
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XMLBEANS-220
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-220
>             Project: XMLBeans
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: XmlObject
>    Affects Versions: Version 2
>         Environment: Windows XP, JDK 1.4.2_05
>            Reporter: James Webster
>
> We have defined a type in the schema as...
> <xsd:complexType name="MyType">
>    <xsd:element name="mandatoryElement" type="xsd:string"/>
>    <xsd:element name="optionalElement" minOccurs="0" type="xsd:string"/>
> </xsd:complexType>
> According to the XML Schema specification, false is the default value for the 
> optional 'nillable' attribute on xsd:element. So the 'optionalElement' 
> element is nillable='false'.
> We instantiate an instance of the MyType class, set the mandatory element and 
> get the value of xmlText()...
> MyType type = MyType.Factory.newInstance();
> type.setMandatoryElement("someValue");
> String xmlText = type.xmlText();
> The value of xmlText generated by XMLBeans v2.0 is...
> <MyType>
>   <mandatoryElement>someValue</mandatoryElement>
>   <optionalElement xsi:nil="true"/>
> </MyType>
> BUT, we would expect (given that optionalElement is NOT nillable) to see the 
> following...
> <MyType>
>   <mandatoryElement>someValue</mandatoryElement>
> </MyType>
> Our investigations into the XMLBeans API suggests that it is not possible 
> (via XmlOptions, etc) to suppress the xsi: attributes, so we believe this may 
> be a bug? We are at no point explicitly setting the optionalElement to null.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to