Hello all,

Thanks to everyone who was able to join the community meeting on March 11.
The discussion was lively and productive, and I appreciate everyone's
contributions.

Below you'll find an auto-generated summary of the meeting. As a follow-up,
I am planning to start discussion threads and create issues. One of these
will be to share the meeting recording and the meeting transcript. I hope
that this will provide a valuable resource for those who were unable to
attend.

Once again, thank you for your participation.

Best,
Ashvin

====
Start time 3/11/24, 7:52:14 AM
End time 3/11/24, 8:57:46 AM

Participants

   1. Albert Wong
   2. Ashvin Agrawal
   3. Dipankar
   4. Ismael Mejía Useche
   5. Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
   6. Kyle
   7. Stamatis Zampetakis
   8. Tim Brown
   9. Vinoth Chandar

====
*Notes Generated by Copilot.*
*Key Topics:*

   - *First release:* The members advised that the first release is a major
   milestone for the project and suggested some tasks to prepare for it, such
   as adding license headers, checking dependencies, renaming classes, and
   automating the release process.
   - *Renaming classes:* The participants agreed that it is better to
   rename the classes that have the "One" prefix to avoid confusion and API
   breakage in the future, and decided to start a discussion thread on GitHub
   to solicit feedback and suggestions from the community.
   - *Community page on the website:* Kyle volunteered to create a
   community page on the website that would have links to the dev mailing
   list, GitHub, Slack, and the community meeting schedule and agenda.
   - *Wiki:* The participants discussed the pros and cons of having a wiki
   for the project, and decided to avoid adding another tool for communication
   and instead use the dev mailing list, GitHub discussions, and Google Docs
   for design discussions and collaboration, and the website for final
   documentation.
   - *Squash and merge:* The participants discussed the issue of squash and
   merge when committing PRs, and agreed that the committers should either
   squash the commits themselves or request the author to do so before
   merging, and also document the contribution guidelines for the project.
   - *CI:* Jesus explained the current CI setup using Azure pipelines and
   GitHub actions, and the challenges and complexities of using a mirror repo
   and a bot. Vinoth shared his experience with Hudi and suggested evaluating
   the budget and resources available for GitHub workflows. The participants
   agreed to discuss this further on the dev mailing list and find a more
   streamlined solution.

Reply via email to