> On Nov 9, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Versioning/release management would seem to be a valid concern though. Do
> you have a tagging/versioning scheme in mind? Would the image get
> "released" on the same cycle as Yetus itself or managed independently?
I’ve been playing around with it, and it looks as though you can create
images that are tagged by branch and a few other ways. So it looks reasonable
to actually make them tagged by release.
> If the intent is for our users to specify this as their base image in the
> FROM clause, then I'd want them to be able to pin to a specific, immutable
> version.
Agreed.
> If the intent is only to provide a starting sample and not a base image,
> then I think versioning is less of a concern.
Agreed here as well.
I think we’ll want to version them and then let user’s decide how they
want to use them. That would cover all the bases, I think.
All that said, I’m having trouble getting docker hub to actually
generate an image. I’ll play around with that some more today hopefully.
