Hey gang.

        YETUS-156’s purpose is to give Yetus the ability to act as 
daily/nightly/whateverly build driver for CI systems.  This way, Yetus’ 
reporting could be part of the CI process rather than just digging through 
mountains of logs looking for errors.  The vast majority of changes are purely 
cosmetic [yay!] but there are quite a few of them to clean up.


        Given:

                * that we don’t have a branch policy (at least, that I’m aware 
of….)
                * YETUS-156 is working well enough in my tests for people to 
start playing with it
                * YETUS-156 is probably reaching the point where it is ‘too big 
to review’ (~40k at last rebase)

        I think it might be useful to setup a branch for YETUS-156, preferably 
with a CTRTM (commit then review then merge)-type policy.  This would give 
others a chance to play, break it up into a reviewable state, give me a chance 
to fix bugs quickly while still providing protection to master if the 0.3.0 
train decides to leave before this is ready.

        In the mean time, I’ve changed YETUS-156 to be an umbrella, if just for 
my own sanity.

        Any thoughts?

        Thanks!

Reply via email to