Ugh, frowny face.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Allen Wittenauer <[email protected]> wrote: > > I forgot to mention something here, which makes it a bit more of a nuanced > decision. The default repos from Ubuntu are set up such that: > > OpenJDK 7 = 14.04 (Trusty) > OpenJDK 8 = 16.04 (Xenial) > > All of the “get 7 on 16.04” and “get 8 on 14.04” I’ve seen have not > been… appealing. (“Figure out which deb you need, then…” or “add the trusty > repos temporarily” or … yeah. Not good.) > > > So if we want to stick with 7, then that means sticking with Trusty. > >> On May 31, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'd love a 0.5.0 release, FWIW. >> >> Would pulling down openjdk 7 artifacts go more reliably? That would >> presumably be a bit less disruptive than also jumping to jdk8. >> >> (for clarity, I don't think this is too aggressive, since the default >> is just an exemplar and folks could always roll their own.) >> >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Allen Wittenauer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> It looks like our default Docker image that we ship with Yetus is >>> failing to build because it can’t download stuff from Oracle. Given that >>> we probably should do at least something to fix it :), I thought it might >>> be time to actually just upgrade the image completely. I’ve filed >>> YETUS-512 which does the following: >>> >>> * Switches the base OS to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04 >>> * Removes all of the Oracle JDK bits >>> * Switches the JDK to OpenJDK 8 (Headless) >>> * Removes a bunch of hacks that are no longer necessary >>> >>> As a result, this one builds significantly faster and is a tad bit >>> smaller. If we think that’s too aggressive, then the alternative is to just >>> remove the Oracle JDK7 bits from the current image. Either way, we’re >>> looking at an incompatible/disruptive change. >>> >>> Sidenote: I’m currently trying to go through all of the 0.5.0 open >>> issues. My goal is to work towards a release relatively soon, but no >>> promises. Haven’t decided yet whether I’m going to tackle some of the >>> bigger issues yet. >>> >>> Thanks. >
