Hi Allen, all,

Thank you for the additional hints. I will work with that in my local
setup. And I am confident your hints and suggestions will deliver on my
intermediate goals. :)

However, next step is setting up a CI and writing a PoC doc for the OFBiz
project.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Pierre Smits
*Proud* *contributor* (but without privileges)* of* Apache OFBiz
<https://ofbiz.apache.org/>, since 2008

*Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
*Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer


On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:45 PM Allen Wittenauer
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> > On Feb 17, 2020, at 5:04 AM, Pierre Smits <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > It seems to me that when credentials are provided, the script does a
> > authentication first before test are executed, and then something starts
> to
> > go wrong.
> >
> > Or am I doing something wrong?
>
>
>         A troubleshooting tip is to look at the patch-dryrun.log in the
> --patch-dir.  That will give you some hints as to why the patch couldn't be
> applied.
>
>         That said, given your previous command lines, I have a suspicion
> that the repo isn't clean.  --dirty-workspace, in particular, will force
> test-patch not to try and remove remnants of things. So the patch has
> already been applied and therefore can't be applied again/leads to general
> confusion as test-patch will pick up other things that have changed outside
> of the patch (since a lot of the work has to be done post-compilation).
>
>         In general, I personally recommend that when using test-patch with
> PRs, create a fresh repo outside of your normal development repo, set
> --basedir to your new testing repo, and add the --resetrepo flag to
> test-patch.  That last flag will make sure that test-patch has a fresh
> working slate to apply things by forcibly cleaning it out, doing pulls,
> setting the branch to trunk/master/whatever, etc.
>
>

Reply via email to