+1

On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 5:16 PM Allen Wittenauer <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I was about to submit, but I made some minor changes to the Project
> Activity section to clean it up and make it a bit more accurate:
>
> ## Project Activity:
> Quite a bit of activity in March, April, and May with some big updates,
> including switching the operating system of the base container.  We are now
> dealing with fallout from those changes with an eye towards making a 0.16
> release later this year.
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 7, 2026, at 1:25 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks Allen!
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 6:00 PM Allen Wittenauer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> (Sorry everyone, the report slipped my mind last month)
> >>
> >> ## Description:
> >> Apache Yetus provides libraries and tools that enable contribution and
> >> release
> >> processes for software projects.
> >>
> >> ## Project Status:
> >> Current project status: Dormant
> >> Issues for the board: None
> >>
> >> ## Membership Data:
> >> Apache Yetus was founded 2015-09-15 (11 years ago)
> >> There are currently 12 committers and 9 PMC members in this project.
> >> The Committer-to-PMC ratio is 4:3.
> >>
> >> Community changes, past quarter:
> >> - No new PMC members. Last addition was Akira Ajisaka on 2018-12-17.
> >> - No new committers. Last addition was Akira Ajisaka on 2018-02-06.
> >>
> >> ## Project Activity:
> >> Quite a bit of activity in March and April with some big updates,
> including
> >> switching the base operating system of the base container.  We are now
> >> dealing with fallout from those changes with an eye towards making a
> 0.16
> >> release this year.
> >>
> >> ## Community Health:
> >> Despite the lack of a board report last month (that's on aw@ being
> >> forgetful),
> >> we're fine. While not a whole lot is happening in the mailing lists,
> there
> >> are
> >> definitely signs of life in commits, github PRs, and JIRA issues. Two
> PMC
> >> members being the most visible and others are watching so getting a
> release
> >> out shouldn't be an issue.
>
>

Reply via email to