Looks good, good to see all things are on track. Thanks!

On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 2:13 PM Chaoran Yu <[email protected]> wrote:

> FYI, I created YUNIKORN-908 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-908> for the work to
> support k8s 1.21, tentatively targeted for v1.0.0 release.
> Also I saw that Kinga has this PR
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-yunikorn-k8shim/pull/271 <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-yunikorn-k8shim/pull/271> that’s
> needed for dropping support for 1.18.
>
> YUNIKORN-891 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-891> is the
> umbrella JIRA for the upcoming release work that I’ll take on in about a
> month.
>
>
>
> > On Oct 22, 2021, at 17:10, Weiwei Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chaoran/Sunil
> >
> > I don't think we have the wiki sort of thing.
> > For in-progress releases, we can use the JIRA tag to track, like Chaoran
> > pointed out:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/YUNIKORN/versions/12350288.
> > For released versions, we publish them to our website:
> > https://yunikorn.apache.org/community/download/.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 4:02 PM Chaoran Yu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I saw that we already have a JIRA filter for 1.0
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/YUNIKORN/versions/12350288>.
> >> Sunil, where is the release Wiki supposed to be? I'll create one for 1.0
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:16 PM Sunil Govindan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Yes. Lets start the planning.
> >>>
> >>> Chaoran, @Chenya, and Wilfred,
> >>> Could we create a release wiki and place this timeline with a Jira
> >> filter?
> >>> I think it will be a good start for this entire process.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Sunil
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 11:54 AM Chenya Zhang <
> >> [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Great to see that we are going to have a new 1.0.0 release!
> >>>>
> >>>> I could help Chaoran and shadow this release. Would be interested in
> >>>> becoming our next release manager but happy to take a fight when it
> >>> comes.
> >>>> :D
> >>>>
> >>>> Will follow up on this thread for v1.0.0.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Chenya
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 11:37 AM Weiwei Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Craig
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think officially supporting 3 major K8s versions should be enough,
> >>> but
> >>>> we
> >>>>> need to update to 1.19, 1.20, and 1.21.
> >>>>> 1.18 is EoL per https://endoflife.date/kubernetes . If we continue
> >> our
> >>>>> release cadence, most likely we can move 1 major release at a time
> >> and
> >>>> that
> >>>>> aligns with the K8s releases.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:29 AM Craig Condit <[email protected]
> >>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Looking forward to 1.0 release as well, and thanks Chaoran for
> >>>>>> volunteering to manage the release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Should we also update our supported version matrix to include 1.18,
> >>>> 1.19,
> >>>>>> 1.20, and 1.21? Updating the e2e test matrix should be a one-line
> >>>> change,
> >>>>>> and as part of the rebuild against 1.20, I verified that 1.21 is
> >>>>> functional.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Craig
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2021, at 2:15 AM, Weiwei Yang <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sounds great, thank you Chaoran!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:51 PM Chaoran Yu <
> >>> [email protected]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hey guys,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I volunteer to be the release manager this time, if nobody else
> >>> has
> >>>>>>>> volunteered already.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The proposed timeline sounds right to be. It will allow for
> >> ample
> >>>> time
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> stabilization and verification.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Chaoran
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:48 PM Weiwei Yang <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Wilfred
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks. Sounds good to me.
> >>>>>>>>> Does anyone want to be the release manager for 1.0? The apache
> >>> way
> >>>>>>>>> encourages more people to get involved in the release process.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:45 PM Wilfred Spiegelenburg <
> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We have been making big steps since our last release. Some
> >> major
> >>>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>>>>> have gone in and some are almost ready. The changes include:
> >>>>>>>>>> - rest API updates
> >>>>>>>>>> - new node storage and sorting
> >>>>>>>>>> - upgrade to a later K8s version as a build dependency
> >>>>>>>>>> - scheduler interface change
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Work is ongoing on generating a new set of performance
> >> figures.
> >>>> This
> >>>>>>>>>> includes documenting how to run our performance tests so we
> >> can
> >>>>> repeat
> >>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>> when we want to.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Based on all this work I would like to propose a 1.0.0 release
> >>> to
> >>>> be
> >>>>>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>>>>> for a vote by the incubator PMC by the start of December 2021.
> >>>> This
> >>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>> give us some time to get the last fixes in and stabilise the
> >>>>> release.
> >>>>>> A
> >>>>>>>>>> release for us is still a multistep project:
> >>>>>>>>>> - fork and prepare the release
> >>>>>>>>>> - vote in the project
> >>>>>>>>>> - vote in the incubator PMC
> >>>>>>>>>> Looking back at the last release cycles that means we should
> >>> have
> >>>> a
> >>>>>>>> build
> >>>>>>>>>> ready for voting by 22 November on the dev list. Which would
> >>> mean
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>> fork the release at the latest in the second week of November.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if the timeline is too ambitious or not
> >>>> ambitious
> >>>>>>>>>> enough.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Wilfred
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to