Ho mon

Do we have a branch using the preview release of spark 2.0?

Cheers
Guillaume

Sent from a small device

> On 08 Jun 2016, at 17:10, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> How about we create release branch 'branch-0.6' from master on 15 June,
> 00:00 PDT, and start release process from that point?
> 
> Most of TLP migration has been done (except for git source repo / mirror
> migration) and we can always create minor release with spark 2.0 support if
> spark 2.0 support is not ready when we cut the release branch.
> 
> Thanks,
> moon
> 
>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:09 PM Vinay Shukla <vinayshu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Agree, let's make our first release as a TLP.
>> 
>> On Wednesday, May 25, 2016, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 on release.If we could sort out Spark 2.0 great, if not we should have
>>> a release anyway.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    _____________________________
>>> From: Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 4:44 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Zeppelin 0.6.0 Release
>>> To:  <dev@zeppelin.apache.org <javascript:;>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you Moon for starting discussion,
>>> I can not agree more - it's time for another release, our first one as
>> TLP!
>>> 
>>> As you said - there are many improvements, more then enough for a new
>>> release, but having Spark 2.0 profile there would be awesome.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Alex
>>> 
>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016, 03:34 Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jonathan Kelly <
>> jonathaka...@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Of course, but it would still be possible for Zeppelin to support
>> Spark
>>>> 2.0
>>>>> using a Maven profile, right? (Handwaving the difficulty of doing so.
>>> I'm
>>>>> mainly just saying that we shouldn't say, "nah, can't do it because
>>> Spark
>>>>> 2.0 isn't GA yet.")
>>>> 
>>>> Agree.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Otherwise, if Zeppelin 0.6.0 is released before Spark 2.0, and we
>> don't
>>>>> make Zeppelin 0.6.0 compatible with Spark 2.0, it may be several
>> months
>>>>> after the Spark 2.0 release before the next version of Zeppelin is
>>>>> releasable and supports Spark 2.0.
>>>> I think releasing Zeppelin as a TLP will be much more easy now :) So
>>> there
>>>> is always the possibility to have a minor release with Spark 2.0
>> support
>>> if
>>>> we don't get it on this one.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Luciano Resende
>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> 

Reply via email to