I haven't thought about about downgrading, but at least, we need to provide a way to install interpreter from UI. And do you think we need to erase interpreter as well? We can unbind some existing interpreters and also delete some interpreter settings as well.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 17:16 Jeff Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does helium UI support interpreter erase/upgrade/downgrade? > > Jongyoul Lee <[email protected]>于2017年7月10日周一 上午11:36写道： > >> Hi, >> >> I think it's time to move to the next step. Zeppelin's web site is >> already changed. Zeppelin's default package also provide same interpreters >> and include markdown and shell. How do you think of it? >> >> Regards, >> Jongyoul >> >> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Jongyoul Lee <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> @Rafffele, >>> >>> After we discuss it with community, then will make a JIRA issue for >>> handling it. :-) >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Park Hoon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> @Jeff > , we need to integrate the install script in zeppelin UI. >>>> >>>> AFAIK, helium has UI to list all available interpreters which are >>>> registered in the central maven repo although this feature doesn't work >>>> currently. >>>> >>>> We can improve this page is used to install interpreters which will be >>>> not included in the default distribution. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [image: Inline image 1] >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Raffaele S <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I believe it's a good idea to select which interpreters to keep in the >>>>> "default release", should we track this through JIRA? >>>>> >>>>> 2017-06-11 17:05 GMT+02:00 Jongyoul Lee <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, Alex. >>>>>> >>>>>> I left comments we started to discuss on it recently. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Alexander Bezzubov <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> great effort! I think people in few other communities will be very >>>>>>> happy >>>>>>> with it i.e [1] and [2]. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there an issue that tracks current status or something like that? >>>>>>> Does >>>>>>> anyone have concrete plans to work on it in this/next release? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry if I have missed that out. And please, keep up a good work! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2269 >>>>>>> 2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/examples/spark#known-issues-with-zeppelin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, 06:54 Jongyoul Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Felix, >>>>>>> > Yes, I said a bit confused. I want to release Zeppelin with some - >>>>>>> not-all >>>>>>> > - interpreters, but deploy all interpreters into maven to install >>>>>>> them if >>>>>>> > users want to use them. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Moon, >>>>>>> > I think it's the best to fit the list as same as homepage by >>>>>>> default as it >>>>>>> > makes users confused less. But if we want to add more >>>>>>> interpreters, I think >>>>>>> > mailing questions and related issues are one of the proper >>>>>>> criteria. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Jeff, >>>>>>> > Agreed. We already had a menu but it just shows how to use >>>>>>> > install-interpreter.sh. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Zhang <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> If possible, we need to integrate the install script in zeppelin >>>>>>> UI. As I >>>>>>> >> would expect many users would ask why some interpreter is missing >>>>>>> and how >>>>>>> >> to install them. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> moon soo Lee <[email protected]>于2017年6月5日周一 上午2:06写道： >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>> Following is last discussion related to release package size. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/69f606409790d7ba11422e8c6df941a75c5dfae0aca63eccf2f840bf@%3Cusers.zeppelin.apache.org%3E >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> at this time, we have discussed about having bin-all (every >>>>>>> >>> interpreters), bin-min (selected interpreters), bin-netinst (no >>>>>>> >>> interpreters) package but didn't conclude the criteria and how >>>>>>> we make a >>>>>>> >>> decision. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> Jongyoul, do you have any idea about criteria? >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>> moon >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:47 AM Felix Cheung < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> Sure - I think it will be important to discuss what criteria to >>>>>>> use to >>>>>>> >>>> decide what is included vs what will be released separately. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> _____________________________ >>>>>>> >>>> From: Jongyoul Lee <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 9:47 AM >>>>>>> >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while >>>>>>> building and >>>>>>> >>>> releasing Zeppelin >>>>>>> >>>> To: dev <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>> Cc: <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> It means we release with some interpreters and deploy all >>>>>>> interpreters >>>>>>> >>>> into >>>>>>> >>>> maven separately. We already had a install-interpreter script >>>>>>> inside >>>>>>> >>>> it. If >>>>>>> >>>> someone wants to install specific interpreter not included in >>>>>>> default >>>>>>> >>>> release package, they can use that script to install specific >>>>>>> one. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Felix Cheung < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> > Are we proposing some interpreters to be built and released >>>>>>> >>>> separately? >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > Is this going to be separate packaging? Or separate release >>>>>>> pipeline? >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > _____________________________ >>>>>>> >>>> > From: Jongyoul Lee <[email protected]<mailto: >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>> <[email protected]>>> >>>>>>> >>>> > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 11:04 PM >>>>>>> >>>> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while >>>>>>> building and >>>>>>> >>>> > releasing Zeppelin >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>> > To: dev <[email protected]<mailto: >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>> <[email protected]>>>, < >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected] >>>>>>> >>>> <[email protected]>>> >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > Hi dev and users, >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>> > Recently, zeppelin.apache.org<http://zeppelin.apache.org> is >>>>>>> being >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> > changed for increasing user experiences and convenience. I >>>>>>> like this >>>>>>> >>>> kind >>>>>>> >>>> > of changes. I, however, saw some arguments that which >>>>>>> interpreters we >>>>>>> >>>> will >>>>>>> >>>> > locate in the first page. I'd like to expand its argument to >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> >>>> package we >>>>>>> >>>> > release. >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > Current zeppelin packages exceed 700MB with default option >>>>>>> because >>>>>>> >>>> > Zeppelin tried to include all interpreters by default. It was >>>>>>> good at >>>>>>> >>>> the >>>>>>> >>>> > early age but, nowadays, Zeppelin community suffer from the >>>>>>> size >>>>>>> >>>> because >>>>>>> >>>> > ASF infra allows the package size under 500MB. So I'd like to >>>>>>> reduce >>>>>>> >>>> the >>>>>>> >>>> > package size by reducing default packages. >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > In case of rebuilding homepage, community proposed some >>>>>>> criteria >>>>>>> >>>> including >>>>>>> >>>> > mailing list and # of question in stackoverflow. I think we >>>>>>> can adapt >>>>>>> >>>> same >>>>>>> >>>> > criteria into release version of Zeppelin. >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > To handle this kind of issue, I think consensus of community >>>>>>> is the >>>>>>> >>>> most >>>>>>> >>>> > important factor. If someone wants to have an idea to deal >>>>>>> with it, >>>>>>> >>>> please >>>>>>> >>>> > feel free to talk about it. >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>> > Jongyoul Lee >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > -- >>>>>>> >>>> > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>>>>>> >>>> > http://madeng.net >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> > >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>>>>>> >>>> http://madeng.net >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>> > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>>>>>> > http://madeng.net >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>>>>> http://madeng.net >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>> http://madeng.net >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >> http://madeng.net >> > -- 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 http://madeng.net
