Hello,

If I remember correctly, Zeppelin tried to keep backward compatibility for
0.X versions until 0.11.0. We made some break changes on 0.11.0 including
deprecating some interpreters[1] and this Shell interpreter issue.

By the way, we'd better explain which Zeppelin supports the specific
versions of interpreters.

I read the link to Semver and it looks good and like a general idea, so I
would like to follow it up but I want to see others' opinions.

Thank you for the good suggestions.

Best regards,
Jongyoul Lee

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Interpreter+Maintenance

2024년 4월 15일 (월) 오후 7:21, Hong Liang <hlteo...@gmail.com>님이 작성:

> +1 I think it would be good to have a clear expectation around the
> backwards compatibility of upgrades in Zeppelin.
>
> There needs to be some nuance here... Since the functionality surface area
> around interpreters is relatively large, it might be hard to ensure all
> features are available per interpreter, but at the very least, we should
> ensure that within Zeppelin's offering it is backwards compatible!
>
> Regards,
> Hong
>
>
> On 2024/04/15 10:06:42 Danny Cranmer wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >     I was reading the shell interpreter thread [1], and it made me wonder
> > about
> >     the backwards compatibility guarantees that Zeppelin offers. As a
> > user, I
> >     would expect to be able to upgrade from 0.11.0 > 0.11.1 without
> > breaking
> >     changes or losing functionality. I would not expect to lose an
> > interpreter.
> >
> >     I had a quick look on the dev mailing list and website and cannot
> find
> >     anything documenting the version strategy. If it does exist, can you
> > please
> >     share the link? If not, I would propose we define a versioning
> strategy
> >     that helps users understand compatibility and guarantees, etc. A good
> > place
> >     to start is semver [2].
> >
> >     I look forward to hearing from the community.
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Danny
> >
> >     [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/opf3h6b0wc4pnsvqsy0b50vzmozd9qbn
> >     [2] https://semver.org/
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Jongyoul Lee

Reply via email to