Just FYI: the reason I was suggesting a *rotation of responsibilities* at first is exactly not to start the journey in ASF with "picking a Chair, VP, etc".
My suggestion is to give everyone equal opportunities to learn the bylaws of foundation, earn merit, study Apache Way from more experienced members first by doing everything necessary to represent the for ASF (of which reporting came as a first example) So in other words my proposal is to rotate all Chair responsibilities by a "reporting period", and as before I'm willing to volunteer to do that. Otherwise I feel like an infant project might be in trap of not really growing a democratic one.. On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:22 PM, moon soo Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have couple of questions about PMC and Incubator and how they work. > > Roman suggested pick one who acting as a Chair for Zeppelin for PMC report. > Would it be wrong if i understand that acting as a Chair is also need to > take care of other things if there is an issue, just like TLP? > (Or is it carefully designed rule with some purpose that project in > incubator does not have Chair?) > > If having an acting as a Chair helps project, I'd like to volunteer, while > I believe I've been driving project and community from the beginning. > > > About rotating PMC report responsibility Alex suggested, while Zeppelin is > in incubator, I agree on it's positive side with one little concern. > Depends on when it graduates and number of new PPMC we can get, possibly > some people may have no chances. It if does not make any problem, I'm good > with it and I'll take next report after the Alex. > > Best, > moon > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Alex B. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sounds great, thank you for explanation Roman. > > It is so true that to have such mentors as you guys is a great > opportunity > > for the project! > > > > If I may, I'd like to suggest we implement the *rotation of the reporting > > responsibility*: this way we maximise number of PPMC people involved in > ASF > > life. It should be possible as we have enough senior members on this list > > who can help. > > > > Having said that, I want to volunteer to take care of the next one, > > February report. > > > > Please, let me know what you think. > > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > 2) should we kindly ask other mentors to sign it off? Which makes > > sense > > > > to > > > > > me, especially in light of ongoing discussion in Incubator list. > > > > > > > > Mentors are required to sign off on each and every report. I can also > > > > assure you that there'll be plenty of feedback for the first couple > of > > > > reports on dev@ ;-) > > > > > > > > > I have to say that having Roman as a co-mentor has not left me a lot to > > do > > > (which is good since I am swatting pretty hard on Kylin). This means > > that > > > signing off the report is something that I look forward to doing. I > > > finally get to do something! > > > > > >
