On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Alexander Bezzubov <[email protected]> wrote: > Roman, James, Jim, Jongyoul, > > thank you guys for a feedback. > > James's point on community growing though the interpreter > contributors\maintainers sounds great indeed and difficulties supporting > external "plugins" with all the versions could overweight the benefits of > such separation. And especially valuable is experience with Cloundstack > that Jim brought in. > > I really like the idea of mixed model like the one that Jim has described: > more mature interpreters should indeed belong to the root, as it is already > now, so we just need to find a technical mean of separating early-stages > ones (until the community steps up to say they are important\mature enough, > by maintaining them). > AFAIK one can also see the same pattern in Apache Spark project. > > Any thought on how such "zeppelin-extras" might work?
Every project I've been part of has always ended up having contrib/ folder for stuff that had that exact 'incubation -- not for real use' flavor to it. Thanks, Roman.
