Hi Roman, Thanks for the feedback. About the release policy, at the moment, I'd like to say it's a feature-driven approach. Because, we have roadmap with features but without timeline set.
Thanks, moon On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:44 PM Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Alexander Bezzubov > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Moon, mentors and fellow PPMCs, > > > > as soon as we all agree that the roadmap on the wiki looks awesome, shall > > we 'itemize' it now in the JIRA issues? (and assign to planned versions) > > Later sub-task can be added as needed. > > I don't think it is a mentor question really. Or at least this is not > something that we can teach you as a universal policy -- this > is more of a sharing of best practices. > > > This will increase traceability and will allow broader set of > contributors > > to basically, contribute :) like taking an issue and start working on it > by > > proposing the solution, review, etc. > > > > Please, let me know what you guys think! > > Personally I'm a big believer in JIRAs being tagged with versions of the > next releases. That said, I think the first question that you may want > to answer is this: what's your release policy? Are you a feature-driven > or a date driven project when it comes to new releases? > > Thanks, > Roman. >
