Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/123#issuecomment-117427149
@khalidhuseynov Thanks for the suggestion. But here's couple of reason i
suggest.
1. having `ZEPPELIN_NOTEBOOK_LOCAL_STORAGE` and
`ZEPPELIN_NOTEBOOK_REMOTE_STORAGE` means changing configuration. That impact
existing user.
2. name 'LOCAL_STORAGE' and 'REMOTE_STORAGE' is not appropriate. because
user provided storage layer can be anything. It can be based on local
filesystem, it can be based on remote storage, it can be based on something
other.
Here's my suggestion,
Let ZEPPELIN_NOTEBOOK_STORAGE receive comma separated class name, so user
can use 1 to n
storage (for now, i think it's okay only handle up to 2 storages). And
always synchronize all the storage.
I think we can keep compatibility of the configuration and generalize this
feature in this say.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
