I think the question is what\who is going to fix issues in these Interpreters if something fails? I am guessing that if one uses these interpreters and approach the community with questions then we might not have the right support for him.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:04 AM moon soo Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > There're some open pullrequests with complete interpreter implementation > but no test (eg. https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/110, > https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/68). > > Personally, I'm feeling not safe having code without test, but at the same > time, keeping these great contributions unmerged sounds not cool. > > I'd like to hear opinions about merging them with some mark such as 'beta' > or 'untested', and create issue for adding test. > > What do you think? > > Thanks, > moon >
