Hi I am questioning myself regarding the groovy interpreter. As I do progress, it is becoming quite similar to the spark interpreter except that I am using the Groovy REPL instead of the Scala REPL
That gives me 2 options: - have the Groovy interpreter grouped with the Spark one - but that would become quite fat and I believe user will choose either scala and/or groovy/java but most probably not both - keep it separated That brings me to the point of the name of the current spark interpreter, would it be better if called scala interpreter ? the same could apply to pyspark versus spark ? I have the feeling that the language has precedence over spark itself - but I am not following zeppelin for a long time so please let me know how it started and please share your view ? Cheers -- PGP KeyID: 2048R/EA31CFC9 subkeys.pgp.net
