Can we get the rinterpreter in?
> On Sep 7, 2015, at 1:17 PM, moon soo Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looks like we have consensus of having 0.5.x release. > > Then, how about following steps for the release? > > 1. Create a release branch. (That means freeze the code, release branch > only receives bug fix) > 2. Create rc artifacts from the release branch > 3. Test rc artifacts, fix bugs. Vote for release, iterate 2-3 > 4. Release > > Here's some decisions to be made. > > When we create release branch? > How we create branch? > How do we handle FixVersion tag of JIRA issue? > > To me, a week later (14/sept), cherry picking master branch to existing > branch "branch-0.5" for creating release branch. And add 0.5.x for > FixVersion for the JIRA issues included in this branch. > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 10:53 PM Anthony Corbacho < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I think its okay to release often minor change (something like 0.5.x). >>> On Aug 30, 2015 1:57 PM, "Alexander Bezzubov" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Enthusiastic +1 on soon 0.5.x release! >>> Great job has been done by the whole community indeed. >>> Then we can release 0.6.0 as soon as the scope is there. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Amos B. Elberg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 on interim release. There have been so many changes it would be >>> helpful >>>> to have a more stable code base to develop against. Any way R could get >>>> into that as an experimental feature? >>>> >>>>> On Aug 28, 2015, at 3:03 AM, moon soo Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> About tracking number downloads >>>>> >>>>> Currently download button just redirects browser to >>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/zeppelin/0.5.0-incubating >>>> . >>>>> Is there any way to get download number from apache.org/dyn? >>>>> Otherwise we need implant some tracking code into the download >> button. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> moon >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:59 PM DuyHai Doan <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for the release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Agree with IT CTO that it would also be interesting to know how many >>>> people >>>>>> are downloading the built version, but I guess we can have the >>> download >>>>>> statistics from Apache repo, don't we ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:48 AM, tog <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While it is important to understand the traction the project has by >>>>>> getting >>>>>>> the number of downloads we have had with the first release, I >> believe >>>> it >>>>>> is >>>>>>> more important to show that the project is progressing well by >>>> providing >>>>>>> new releases. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for an intermediate release >>>>>>>> On Aug 28, 2015 6:59 AM, "IT CTO" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree a great progress has been made but before we invest time >> in >>>>>>>> releasing do we have a record of how meny people use the released >>>>>> version >>>>>>>> and not build from source? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> בתאריך יום ו׳, 28 באוג׳ 2015, 08:47 מאת moon soo Lee < >>> [email protected] >>>>>>> : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd like to discuss about upcoming release. >>>>>>>>> A lot of improvements have been made since 0.5.0-incubating >>> release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 4 Interpreters are added (there're more work in progress), >>>>>>>>> security for websocket and rest api are improved, >>>>>>>>> ux improved a lot, >>>>>>>>> more documentation, >>>>>>>>> many bug fixes, >>>>>>>>> and so on >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think improvements are good enough to make a release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> However, next version, 0.6.0 is not completely done according to >>> the >>>>>>>>> roadmap. >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Zeppelin+Roadmap >>> . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, how about having one more 0.5.x release before 0.6.0? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> moon >>
