Hi, Time based release will be good, and my +1 Firstly of all there must to be planning which features will mapping to each release in brief level.
and also +1 for Alex idea on nominating a release-manager for each quarter On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Nihal Bhagchandani < nihal_bhagchand...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Moon, > > I think its a good idea to have planned pre-define releases as suggested > by Vinay. > > Nihal > > > > On Thursday, 17 September 2015 9:23 AM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi Vinay, > > Thanks for great suggestion. > As you know, current roadmap is feature based. But I think it really make > sense to have regular, time based release policy. > > 4 releases/year is very reasonable i think. > > While we're in discussion of 0.5.x release, I think we can think changing > release policy from feature based to time based right after 0.5.x release. > > What do you guys think? > > Best, > moon > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:39 PM Vinay Shukla <vinayshu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > So far there has been one release of Zeppelin. In the last few months > there has been much work in the community to add new features and fix > issues. > > It will be great to also have a predictable release schedule for Zeppelin. > Generally software projects are either time boxed or feature boxed. > The time boxed releases are very helpful for fast moving projects and to > help plan. > For example, the knowledge that a new iPhone version comes out every > september help people plan their upgrade, or a train's schedule helps > passengers plan their trip. > It will be great to make Zeppelin releases predictable to help the > Zeppelin community plan their uptake. > > So far the current roadmap is feature based. But we don't know when 0.6.0 > will be released. > > It would be great to do 4 releases/year for this young project. May I > request the community to consider releasing 4 releases/year? > > Thank you, > > Vinay > > > > -- Cheers, Madhuka Udantha http://madhukaudantha.blogspot.com
