Are you all sure this is how we want to run an open source project? I can say I wrote this code but it doesn't make it right. When we contribute code to the open source community we prefer the better good then our own private ego.
I have been working with the zeppelin project since its beginning and I trust the way it is managed. R interpreter is a great contribution but does not worth trashing the project or our community. I hope we find a way to take words back and act as we are expected of. On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 at 22:22 elbamos <g...@git.apache.org> wrote: > Github user elbamos commented on the pull request: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/208#issuecomment-157158373 > > To anyone who may be coming here from today's blog post and confused > by these comments about the current status: > > The RInterpreter for zeppelin works fine with Spark 1.4.x, and should > compile straight out of the box. > The travis build is failing because of bugs in other parts of the way > Zeppelin interfaces with Spark. > I expect to be pushing a new revision of the Interpreter, with Spark > 1.5.x support, in the next day or so. > > Why the comments about the PR? Yesterday I discovered that someone > (Felix Cheung) had been demo'ing this code to R user groups on the West > Coast, claiming to have done the work. One of the lead Zeppelin developers > was present for at least one of these demos. > > Short version of the backstory: When I'd announced the project to the > Zeppelin developer's list, Felix had pleaded to participate. I said "ok," > but Felix failed to do any work. Not a single line of code. When I told > him I was making the PR without him, he threatened that if he was not given > credit he would sabotage the project by claiming that the code had been > stolen from him. He carried-through with his threat, and I had to produce > chat logs and e-mail chains to demonstrate that he was lying. > Unfortunately, he's apparently also friends with at least one of the lead > Zeppelin developers. > > In any event, I will be deciding after the next push how I will move > forward. > > > --- > If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your > reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature > enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please > contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket > with INFRA. > --- >
