It went quite well. Since I have run 4-5 of these previously, I think I sensed fewer exploded heads in the audience, and even some rather clever questions, such as;
I didn't mention what happens if more than one Mixin implements the same method. "Will there be an error?" "What's the difference between Composite Oriented Programming and the Composite/Facade in GangOfFour patterns?" "What are the future plans for messaging integration?" "What kind of metrics can be extracted?" (I mentioned a metrics SPI is being worked on) And some people came up afterwards and want more/deeper presentations again in the future, and I suggested we do a small workshop on my next trip, to give those who are interested a bit of hands-on. A few slides were changed, I will upload Keynote/PDF later. // Niclas On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: > Niclas, > > I am currently in Romania, and local Java User Group on Thursday, limited > > to 200 seats. There was a poll to see which *two* of > > * Apache Software Foundation - How does it work? > > * Apache Incubator - How to get a project into Apache? > > * Qi4j - Composite Oriented Programming > > * Commercialization of Open Source > > > > that I should talk about, and >75% gave one of the votes on Qi4j. > > > > I will brush up the talk from Shanghai Apache Roadshow 2011 (?), and *any > > ideas to pique the interest* to get involved in this audience is > > appreciated. > Looks like it was Shanghai Apache Roadshow 2010 :) > cf. http://qi4j.org/2010/08/30/apache-roadshow-shanghai.html > > The code-first approach, opposed to a theory-first approach, seems good > for a talk. The few I did here in France for small groups years ago > worked well that way. Before reading your 2010 report I tried the > theory-first approach and got people sleeping pretty quick... > > I think Qi4j core alone has what's needed to pique the interest of > developpers. > > Cheers > > /Paul > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
