Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Looking at it today I don't know why key order should matter.
>> I'd say that having more idiomatic JSON would make usage less contrived,
>> which would be a good thing.
>
> I agree that is very desirable, and it is now mostly a matter of how to
> handle data migration, if we go with Kent's advice.
>
> Obviously no one uses NamedAssociation, since I can't see that this ever
> worked, as there is a mismatch (serialize object and deserialize an array)
> at the moment.
>
> Kent, good to know that JS is cool with that.
>
> The quickest fix was to change the Serializer to match the Deserializer for
> NamedAssociations. And I am committing that version shortly in a separate
> branch...
>
> But, while discussing this, I think we should do this;
>
> a. Change NamedAssociation to be serialized in "object" form now.
> b. Keep the Map serialization for now as it is.
> c. Plan the change for 3.0 later in the year, giving us a bit of time to
> figure out the migration.
>
> WDYT?
Sounds like a good plan.
