Second thought... Let's do like this; Keep the existing groupId for 2.x releases, and we can re-open this discussion for 3.0.
The qi4j.org domain name is being transferred to ASF at the moment (note to self; need to check the hold up), on the grounds that we will be able to keep compatibility as long as we want. Cheer On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: > Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > > I suggest org.apache.zest > Yeah, maybe it would be simpler to register org.apache.zest at > repositories.apache.org. WDYT? > > But, looking at actual artifacts "hierarchy" and our build system > organization it seems we should use org.apache.zest.qi4j for Qi4j > artifacts. > > groupIds: > > org.apache.zest.qi4j.core > org.apache.zest.qi4j.libraries > org.apache.zest.qi4j.extensions > > artifactIds: > > org.apache.zest.qi4j.core.api > org.apache.zest.qi4j.core.runtime > org.apache.zest.qi4j.library.something > org.apache.zest.qi4j.extension.whatever > ... > > Yes, they are quite long as we pay the Apache > Zest > Qi4j umbrellas > chain. Group & Artifact IDs should reflect our organization, that is > Qi4j is a subproject of Zest. It will also pave the way for future > subprojects like Qi4cs. > > Would that be ok for you guys? Or you do have a shorter suggestion? > > Cheers > > /org.apache.zest.qi4j.Paul :) > > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
