On 2.7.2015 1:29, Kent Sølvsten wrote:
Next thought: We really want some of the composite types to be explicit
for application writers - but it would be nice to allow adding new
composite types (messages). Hmmmm, could a Module be some sort of
(structural/architectural) Composite, too? Composes of some
entity-handling/value-handling/service-handling. Obviously that could
lead to some chicken and egg problem (or "It's turtles all the way
down"). But would represent an awesome fit with the vision of Qi4J as
"composite-oriented programming" - hmmmm could we consider services as
properties on a module ?
Maybe adding new features to a basic ModuleComposite is really what we
need for a proper handling of spatial extensions too?
I like this idea of having Module as Composite.
In Qi4CS, I think this would mean the StructureServiceProvider to be a
Composite.
I have to investigate further into this! :)
