Illegal characters :-) Den 12/07/2015 20.27 skrev "Kent Sølvsten" <[email protected]>:
> Not able to analyse from My holliday on crete. But: provided we wont run > into trouble with illegal charterselskaber in XML elements i agree . I > Thing the default should be changed for 3.0 though. > Den 12/07/2015 16.58 skrev "Niclas Hedhman" <[email protected]>: > >> Gang, >> The StaxValueSerialization format is very verbose, and possibly only >> suitable with an XML browser (i.e. a regular browser with a CSS to make it >> into tables) >> >> From testcase; >> <?xml version="1.1" >> >> encoding="utf-8"?><object><field><name>number</name><value>42</value></field><field><name>nullString</name><value><null></null></value></field><field><name>emptyString</name><value></value></field><field><name>stringList</name><value><array></array></value></field><field><name>anotherNull</name><value><null></null></value></field><field><name>anotherListNull</name><value><null></null></value></field><field><name>anotherListEmpty</name><value><array></array></value></field><field><name>testEnum</name><value>somevalue</value></field><field><name>foo</name><value><object><field><name>_type</name><value>org.qi4j.test.value.AbstractValueCompositeSerializationTest$FooValue</value></field><field><name>bar</name><value></value></field></object></value> >> >> <snip/> >> >> I doubt anybody is using it, and my question is whether it should be kept >> at all, or I should do the same as I did with JSON Maps format, where the >> current format is default, and that a Options flag indicates a leaner >> format, where the tag name is the property name and the element value is >> the value. >> >> WDYAT? >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java >> >
