+1, after clarification. Everything I looked at, looks good. On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Jiri Jetmar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Paul, Niclas and all the others, > > +1 > > Great job done, thanks you a lot ! > > Cheers, > Jiri > > 2015-07-28 15:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Merlin <[email protected]>: > > > Dear community, > > > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for Apache Zest (Java Edition) 2.1! > > > > The changelog for this release can be found here: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316820&version=12332997 > > > > Tag: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zest-java.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.1-RC1 > > > > The artifacts to be voted on are located here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zest/ > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zest/KEYS > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Zest (Java Edition) 2.1. > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast and there must be more positive than > > negative votes. > > > > [ ] +1 Release Apache Zest (Java Edition) 2.1 > > [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok > > [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Zest (Java Edition) 2.1 because... > > > > Here is my vote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Cheers > > > > /Paul > > > > > > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
