[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEST-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Niclas Hedhman closed ZEST-57.
------------------------------
Closing all fixed issues.
> ElasticSearch Query engine generate immense term queries on "large"
> associations
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZEST-57
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEST-57
> Project: Zest
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Paul Merlin
> Assignee: Paul Merlin
> Labels: elasticsearch, extensions, indexing
> Fix For: 2.1
>
>
> See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/qi4j-dev/g4BF0q7tqc4
> Jaydatt Desai a écrit :
> > Hello Gentlemen,
> >
> > I was doing some testing with ManyAssociation, where I was adding
> > many(~200) number of entities to this ManyAssociation property. For
> > Index/Query here is ElasticSearch.
> > So, when I was executing this test case it failed and throws an
> > "ElasticSearchIndexException". This is only occurred when trying to
> > associate entities up to some limit (works perfectly with ~100 entities in
> > this case, but throws exception when we try to associate ~200), and this
> > limit vary upon entity size.
> >
> > Details are below:
> > Exception:
> > org.qi4j.index.elasticsearch.ElasticSearchIndexException: failure in bulk
> > execution:
> > [178]: index [qi4j_index], type [qi4j_entities], id
> > [869f4cf5-b258-4aa4-9536-c11b336862c5-0], message
> > [IllegalArgumentException[Document contains at least one immense term in
> > field="_all" (whose UTF8 encoding is longer than the max length 32766), all
> > of which were skipped. Please correct the analyzer to not produce such
> > terms. The prefix of the first immense term is: '[38 36 39 66 34 63 66 35
> > 2d 62 32 35 38 2d 34 61 61 34 2d 39 35 33 36 2d 63 31 31 62 33 33]...']]
> > at
> > org.qi4j.index.elasticsearch.ElasticSearchIndexer$Mixin.notifyChanges(ElasticSearchIndexer.java:150)
> > at
> > org.qi4j.spi.entitystore.StateChangeNotificationConcern$1.commit(StateChangeNotificationConcern.java:44)
> > at
> > org.qi4j.spi.entitystore.ConcurrentModificationCheckConcern$ConcurrentCheckingEntityStoreUnitOfWork$1.commit(ConcurrentModificationCheckConcern.java:116)
> >
> > Code:
> >
> > @Test
> > public void testManyAssociation() throws Exception{
> > UnitOfWork uow = module.newUnitOfWork();
> > TestEntity testEntity =
> > module.currentUnitOfWork().newEntity(TestEntity.class);
> >
> > for(int i = 0 ; i<200; i++) {
> > TestEntity2 testEntity2 =
> > module.currentUnitOfWork().newEntity(TestEntity2.class);
> > testEntity2.property().set("test");
> > testEntity.manyAssociation().add(testEntity2);
> > }
> > uow.complete();
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> > public interface TestEntity
> > extends EntityComposite
> > {
> > @Optional
> > Property<String> property();
> >
> > ManyAssociation<TestEntity2> manyAssociation();
> > }
> >
> > public interface TestEntity2
> > extends EntityComposite
> > {
> > @Optional
> > Property<String> property();
> >
> > @Optional
> > Property<List<Byte>> binaryProperty();
> >
> > }
> >
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
