QueryProcessor, sure. I like QueryResolver better, and even QueryResolutionProvider better, albeit a long name.
Anyone else? On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: > Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > > Gang, > > > > The EntityFinder is NOT really an EntityFinder at all, but a > QueryExecutor > > that returns EntityReferences, void of Entity types (good!). > > > > I suggest to change that name to reflect what it does. > > > > And because of that, entity type visibility is not an issue for the > > implementations. > > > > Cheers > > Yeah, we should rename it. > > Having "query" in the name of that thing sounds good to me. > > However, at first sight I kind of dislike the "Executor" suffix, makes > me think about thread pools. Not a strong feeling though, at all. > > Throwing names in the air: > > - QueryProcessor > - QuerySolver > - QueryHandler > - QueryRunner > - QueryWhatever ... > > I kind of like QueryProcessor. > > My 2 cents > > Cheers > > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
