[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEST-180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15598854#comment-15598854
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on ZEST-180:
-------------------------------------
With the introduction of Identity, it feels that both DDD sample applications
are actually fairly poorly designed. VoyagerNumber, TrackingId, UnLoCode are
all explicit identity types, and should be the Identity of the Entity types
that they identify. That would also lead to a wider use of Associations in the
design, and not this constant "get the Property, take the id, look up the
entity" which is currently occurring.
Therefore, I want to remove these examples and basically re-implement them
later, perhaps starting from scratch, from the DDD Sample that these 2 were
actually originating from, which may(!) have evolved since.
> Replace String with Identity
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: ZEST-180
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEST-180
> Project: Zest
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
>
> We use java.lang.String in many places instead of the Identity type.
> We should replace all those usages with an explicit Identity, to
> strengthening the APIs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
