Re: Project name change

[Georg Ragaller]

I like the Accaly(zer) idea, because of it's uniqueness (== 
searchability) and
aphabetic placement. If a 'real' word/name is preferred, I like Zebu.
And I agree with Jiri, that Accaly would better match a framework, than 
Accalyzer,
which sounds more like an active entity.

Cheers,
Georg


Am 2016-11-07 23:45, schrieb Jiri Jetmar:
Accalyzer - hmm, sounds more like a "tool", then a framework / pattern 
or
approach.

But definitely a unique name !

Apache Akira - at least for me it sounds clear & simple, but somehow
female. Do we want that ?

Otherwise what about to shorten Accalyzer to Apache Accaly ?

Cheers,
Jiri

2016-11-07 23:35 GMT+01:00 Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>:

Since we seem to be anti-bikeshedding, I am pulling out one metric 
that may
influence a choice. This is the main reason I like the fabricated 
Accalyzer
name. Easily searchable, to track StackOverflow, and other venues 
where it
may surface.

"Google hit count, ascending"

-  Accalyzer = 0
- Zuqi = 80,600
- Mescal(ero) (Google also report Mezcal) = 1,270,000
- Zop = 2,940,000
- Gulu = 10,800,000
- Zebu = 2,770,000
-  Abalone = 15,400,000
- Zeno = 18,800,000
- Verdure = 24,000,000
- Stamina = 41,900,000
- Zenith = 75,600,000
- Zulu = 77,200,000
- Puma = $79,000,000
- Akira = 123,000,000
- Qi = 161,000,000
- Zoe = 173,000,000
- Zen = 297,000,000
- Essence = 305,000,000
- COP = 306,000,000
- Aura = 324,000,000
- Zopper = 597,000,000
- Energy = 1,500,000,000




--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java