[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12974067#action_12974067
 ] 

Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-919:
-----------------------------------------

vishal your patch is a start, but i think the issue identified by camille is a 
bit more profound.

i'm going to work on the test case for this issue and the other that camille 
identified. in the meantime it would be interesting to see if just doing what 
you have in the patch makes your problem go away.

> Ephemeral nodes remains in one of ensemble after deliberate SIGKILL
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-919
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-919
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.1
>         Environment: Linux CentOS 5.3 64bit, JDK 1.6.0-22
> SLES 11
>            Reporter: Chang Song
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.3.3, 3.4.0
>
>         Attachments: logs.tar.gz, logs2.tar.gz, logs3.tar.gz, zk.patch
>
>
> I was testing stability of Zookeeper ensemble for production deployment. 
> Three node ensemble cluster configuration.
> In a loop, I kill/restart three Zookeeper clients that created one ephemeral 
> node each, and at the same time,
> I killed Java process on one of ensemble (dont' know if it was a leader or 
> not). Then I restarted Zookeeper on the server,
> It turns out that on two zookeeper ensemble servers, all the ephemeral nodes 
> are gone (it should), but on the newly started
> Zookeeper server, the two old ephemeral nodes stayed.  The zookeeper didn't 
> restart in standalone mode since new ephemeral
> nodes gets created on all ensemble servers. 
> I captured the log.
> 2010-11-04 17:48:50,201 - INFO  
> [NIOServerCxn.Factory:0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:17288:nioservercnxn$fact...@250] - 
> Accepted socket connection from /10.25.131.21:11191
> 2010-11-04 17:48:50,202 - INFO  
> [NIOServerCxn.Factory:0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:17288:nioserverc...@776] - Client 
> attempting to establish new session at /10.25.131.21:11191
> 2010-11-04 17:48:50,203 - INFO  [CommitProcessor:1:nioserverc...@1579] - 
> Established session 0x12c160c31fc000b with negotiated timeout 30000 for 
> client /10.25.131.21:11191
> 2010-11-04 17:48:50,206 - WARN  
> [NIOServerCxn.Factory:0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:17288:nioserverc...@633] - 
> EndOfStreamException: Unable to read additional data from client sessionid 
> 0x12c160c31fc000b, likely client has closed socket
> 2010-11-04 17:48:50,207 - INFO  
> [NIOServerCxn.Factory:0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:17288:nioserverc...@1434] - Closed 
> socket connection for client /10.25.131.21:11191 which had sessionid 
> 0x12c160c31fc000b
> 2010-11-04 17:48:50,207 - ERROR [CommitProcessor:1:nioserverc...@444] - 
> Unexpected Exception:
> java.nio.channels.CancelledKeyException
>         at sun.nio.ch.SelectionKeyImpl.ensureValid(SelectionKeyImpl.java:55)
>         at sun.nio.ch.SelectionKeyImpl.interestOps(SelectionKeyImpl.java:59)
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.sendBuffer(NIOServerCnxn.java:417)
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.sendResponse(NIOServerCnxn.java:1508)
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.FinalRequestProcessor.processRequest(FinalRequestProcessor.java:367)
>         at 
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.CommitProcessor.run(CommitProcessor.java:73)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to