[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13000765#comment-13000765
 ] 

Thomas Koch commented on ZOOKEEPER-999:
---------------------------------------

Hi Eric,

I'd suggest to drop the building of deb packages from your patch and instead 
join efforts to have ZooKeeper in Debian as polished and current as possible. 
There's very much more about a proper .deb package then just getting the thing 
running.
Do you have any need for .deb packages of snapshots or is it enough for you to 
have packages for each release?

I don't know anything about RPMs so I can't give any suggestions about that. 
Have you asked anybody at Red Hat / Fedora to build official packages?

I've asked on IRC and fedora people pointed me to the following pages if 
someone wants to start building RPMs:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

Do you really need RPMs?

Please also keep in mind that there already are "inofficial" ZooKeeper packages 
from cloudera.

> Create an package integration project
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-999
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-999
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: build
>         Environment: Java 6, RHEL/Ubuntu
>            Reporter: Eric Yang
>             Fix For: 3.4.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-999.patch
>
>
> This goal of this ticket is to generate a set of RPM/debian package which 
> integrate well with RPM sets created by HADOOP-6255.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to