[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13130756#comment-13130756
]
Daniel Gómez Ferro commented on ZOOKEEPER-723:
----------------------------------------------
I thought about this better and maybe Ben is right, we should create an
ephemeral child instead of having to deal with more complex logic. Do you think
"firstChild" is a good name? Should we let the user choose it, or maybe use a
more abstract one (some symbol, "placeholder"...) ?
> ephemeral parent znodes
> -----------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-723
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: server
> Reporter: Benjamin Reed
> Assignee: Daniel Gómez Ferro
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-723.patch, ZOOKEEPER-723.patch
>
>
> ephemeral znodes have the nice property of automatically cleaning up after
> themselves when the creator goes away, but since they can't have children it
> is hard to build subtrees that will cleanup after the clients that are using
> them are gone.
> rather than changing the semantics of ephemeral nodes, i propose ephemeral
> parents: znodes that disappear when they have no more children. this cleanup
> would happen automatically when the last child is removed. an ephemeral
> parent is not tied to any particular session, so even if the creator goes
> away, the ephemeral parent will remain as long as there are children.
> the when an ephemeral parent is created it will have an initial child, so
> that it doesn't get immediately removed. i think this child should be an
> ephemeral znode with a predefined name, "firstChild".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
