I'm fine with your proposal. -Flavio
On Nov 5, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Camille Fournier wrote:
2 has been flaky for so long, not sure whether it's worth being a
blocker.
The AsyncHammerTests never pass for me locally. Not sure if it's a
problem or not... I am tempted to go with Mahadev on this and get this
3.4 release out the door. I would be happy to help manage a 3.4.1
release soon thereafter if we find serious issues.
C
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]>
wrote:
If 2) is flakey, we need to fix it, no?
-Flavio
On Nov 5, 2011, at 6:14 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
I ran the 1270-1194 patch continually overnight (trunk) in my ci
env,
after ~25 test runs I saw 4 failures:
1) #402 - QuorumTest.testFollowersStartAfterLeader
2) #407 - org.apache.zookeeper.test.FLETest.testLE
3) #410 - org.apache.zookeeper.test.AsyncHammerTest.testHammer
4) #415 - org.apache.zookeeper.test.AsyncHammerTest.testHammer
1) client could not connect to reestablished quorum: giving up after
30+ seconds.
2) known flakey test
3) QP failed to shutdown in 30 seconds:
QuorumPeer[myid=3]0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:11224
4) QP failed to shutdown in 30 seconds:
QuorumPeer[myid=1]0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:11222
On the plus side no "testearlyleaderabandon" failures.
On the minus side 3/4 are a bit worrysome. Searching back through
all
my previous failures I don't see this happening. Perhaps these
changes
have shifted some timing? My main concern is that this might be
caused
directly by the patch itself....
Patrick
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
[email protected]
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301
flavio
junqueira
research scientist
[email protected]
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301
