>ZK is moving to maven, I would prefer to just jump recipes to there >directly. I can set up the project initially. Better for me. Curator is Maven already.
-JZ On 12/5/11 3:29 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >Some nuances. Overall, I like the way you are working for consensus. > >On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Jordan Zimmerman ><jzimmer...@netflix.com>wrote: > >> I see - this would be done in Ivy. OK by me. >> > >ZK is moving to maven, I would prefer to just jump recipes to there >directly. I can set up the project initially. > > >> >> So, to summarize, there are 3 possibilities: >> >> * Push Curator into ZooKeeper proper under a new recipes artifact. >>Curator >> would get n committers from Netflix with the understanding that their >> focus is on Curator >> > >Initially, n would be a very small number (possibly even 0, but that seems >unnecessary). The number could increase over time. > > >> * Start a sub-project ala BookKeeper for ZooKeeper with its own >>committer >> list >> * Put Curator into the Incubator and follow that road >> >> Ted (and now I) prefer the first option. I believe Patrick prefers the >> third option but would accept the second. How do the others feel? >> >> >I don't really think that we have heard from Patrick on option 1. I think >he was thinking I was suggesting option 2 and I agree with him that is >sub-optimal.
