That will be our responsibility once (if) this is accepted. On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <jzimmer...@netflix.com>wrote:
> As long as the doc for the legacy recipes point ppl to the new > implementations that would be fine. What should be avoided is someone > casually looking at the docs and using the legacy version because he > wasn't aware that there was a newer one. > > -JZ > > On 12/15/11 12:17 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>I thought that that would be confusing. My thinking is that most people > >> are going to get ZooKeeper because they need to do X (locking, leader, > >> etc.). They won't spend a lot of time learning the internals and will > >>just > >> search for the recipe they need. If they see two they'd be uncertain. > >> > > > >This is what Javadoc is for. If one of the legacy recipes is distinctly > >less good than a new one, we should document the distinction and give a > >pointer in the javadoc. > >
