[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13176099#comment-13176099
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1326:
--------------------------------------
+1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12508663/ZOOKEEPER-1326.patch
against trunk revision 1222816.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9)
warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/858//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/858//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/858//console
This message is automatically generated.
> The CLI commands "delete" and "rmr" are confusing. Can we have "rm" + "rmr"
> instead?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1326
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1326
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: java client
> Affects Versions: 3.4.0
> Reporter: Harsh J
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1326.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1326.patch
>
>
> ZOOKEEPER-729 introduced 'rmr' for recursive 'delete' operations on a given
> node. Going by the unix convention, wouldn't it be much better if we were to
> have an 'rm' if there was an 'rmr' added?
> The current set is confusing. Or should we have 'delete' and 'deleteall' or
> summat?
> I know this is a nitpick, but I just dislike to see bad keywords used for
> commands.
> I'm OK to produce a backwards-compatible patch if this is acceptable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
