-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3910/#review5238
-----------------------------------------------------------



bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/bookie/FileSystemUpgrade.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3910/#comment11437>

    should it be a constant define?


- Sijie


On 2012-02-15 14:08:46, Ivan Kelly wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3910/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-02-15 14:08:46)
> 
> 
> Review request for bookkeeper.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Part of BOOKKEEPER-163. This improvement creates a framework to allow 
> administrators to upgrade the filesystem layout of previous bookkeeper 
> versions to be usable by the most recent software. The upgrade processes are 
> currently empty until BOOKKEEPER-163 adds something.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug BOOKKEEPER-172.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-172
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   bookkeeper-server/bin/bookkeeper b0629bd 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/bookie/FileSystemUpgrade.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> bookkeeper-server/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/bookie/UpgradeTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3910/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ivan
> 
>

Reply via email to