Thank you.

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> wrote:

> In what you're describing, your service creates ephemeral nodes on behalf
> of its clients, and has to track the clients liveness. You're redoing a lot
> of the logic ZK would handle for you if you had your clients talk directly
> to ZK, but you can certainly reimplement that logic if you want. I think
> this is a less-than-ideal system design but if you have a system where
> stateful connections don't make sense it might be the best you can do.
>
> I would recommend spending some time with the ZK documentation and a
> highlighter, it sounds like you might want to design something fairly
> complex and it's useful to really understand the system well before you
> start on such a task.
>
> C
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Narayanan A R <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does ZK support ephermal node creation for stateless clients. Anyone has
> > dealt with similar requests? For instance, one or more clients would make
> > REST API call to a service and it in turns creates nodes in ZK.
> Connections
> > could be active between the service and ZK but not to the client. I am
> > looking something like a client would touch a znode periodically for the
> > heartbeat and if the heartbeat goes away, the nodes created by that
> client
> > should get deleted. Is this supported?
> >
> > Similarly, I am looking for notifications for stateless clients.
> Basically
> > registering a post pack URL for ZK to make a callback.
> >
> > Regards,
> > ARN
> >
>

Reply via email to