Putting multi into 3.3 is not technically hard, but it breaks the contract of no API changes for point releases.
If you can upgrade to 3.3.n+1, why can't you upgrade to 3.4? On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > I forgot to mention that some companies (such as StumbleUpon) run zookeeper > 3.3.x ensemble in production. > The dependency listed below is for zookeeper client. > > Cheers > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My petition was to get this feature into Apache zookeeper 3.3.x > > Currently HBase trunk relies on: > > <zookeeper.version>3.4.3</zookeeper.version> > > > > If porting is allowed, I can finish up the remaining work. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Marshall McMullen < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hey, I wrote most of the multi code and when I wrote it we were still > >> using > >> 3.3.x. So I have patches for the 3.3.x branch if you're interested. Let > me > >> know if you want me to post them in a jira somewhere, or just email them > >> directly to you. > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > In several HBase JIRAs, developers tried to resort to multi(). > >> > The latest effort appeared in HBASE-2611. > >> > > >> > But there hasn't been consensus when zookeeper 3.4 would be listed as > >> > minimum requirement. > >> > > >> > I wonder how difficult it is to port multi() to zookeeper 3.3.x > >> > > >> > Cheers > >> > > >> > > > > >
